Retirement Planning at 40: A Real Numbers Case Study for a Canadian Couple#

Most retirement planning articles stay abstract. "Save 15% of your income." "Use the 4% rule." "Maximize your RRSP." Good principles, but hard to act on without seeing how they apply to a real situation with real numbers.

This article does something different. We're going to walk through a complete retirement plan for a fictional couple — David and Mary, both 40, living in Ontario — and show exactly what happens when you run their scenario through a retirement withdrawal calculator. What does the calculator reveal? Where are they at risk? What small changes have a big impact?

By the end, you'll understand not just the principles but the specific levers that move a retirement plan from "maybe" to "confident."

---

Meet David and Mary#

David, 40, is an IT manager at a mid-sized company in Kitchener. He earns $110,000/year. He's been contributing to his RRSP since he was 26, and his employer matches 4% of salary to a group RRSP. He has no defined benefit pension.

Mary, 40, is a pharmacist working at a hospital. She earns $105,000/year. She has been contributing to the hospital's defined benefit pension plan for 12 years. She also has personal RRSP and TFSA savings from before and during her career.

They own a home in Waterloo (no mortgage — they paid it off aggressively). They have two kids, ages 12 and 14, both with RESPs that are mostly funded.

Their goal: retire at 57, about 17 years from now. They want to spend $90,000/year (in today's dollars) in retirement.

---

Their Current Financial Snapshot (April 2026)#

Combined investable assets today: $382,000 Annual savings rate: ~$42,000/year combined Asset allocation: 80% equity ETFs / 20% bonds (both agree they can tolerate volatility)

---

Mary's DB Pension: A Key Asset#

Mary's hospital DB pension is a significant piece of the retirement picture that many couples underestimate because it doesn't show up as a dollar balance on a statement.

Here's how her projected pension is estimated at age 57:

Mary's pension also includes:

• Indexing: CPI-indexed (up to 2%/year cap)
• Survivor benefit: 60% joint life
• Bridge benefit: extra $8,000/year between ages 57–65 (to bridge before CPP/OAS start)

This is a enormously valuable benefit. The commuted value of $72,500/year indexed pension for a healthy 57-year-old is approximately $1.6–$1.9 million. For planning purposes, treating the pension as equivalent to a large portfolio generating income is exactly right.

---

CPP Projections#

Neither David nor Mary will contribute to CPP for the full 39 years. They're stopping at 57. Let's estimate their CPP at age 65 (their planned start):

David: Has contributed since age 22. By 57, that's 35 years of contributions. Assuming average earnings above the YMPE for most of his career, estimated CPP at 65: ~$1,050/month ($12,600/year).

Mary: Has contributed since age 28. By 57, that's 29 years of contributions. Estimated CPP at 65: ~$950/month ($11,400/year).

Combined CPP at 65: ~$24,000/year

They could consider delaying to 70 for a 42% increase:

• David at 70: ~$17,900/year
• Mary at 70: ~$16,200/year
• Combined at 70: ~$34,100/year

The delay question is one the calculator will help answer.

---

OAS Projections#

Both David and Mary were born in Canada and have lived here continuously. They'll each qualify for maximum OAS at 65:

• OAS at 65 (2026 rate): ~$8,700/year per person
• Combined OAS at 65: ~$17,400/year

Delayed to 70 (36% increase each):

• Combined OAS at 70: ~$23,700/year

---

The Gap: How Much Does the Portfolio Need to Cover?#

Target spending: $90,000/year (in today's dollars; inflated at 2.5% = about $130,000/year in 17 years)

Income from Mary's pension at 57:

• Main pension: $72,500/year (CPI-indexed up to 2%)
• Bridge benefit to 65: extra $8,000/year for 8 years
• Total ages 57–65: $80,500/year

Gap at retirement (age 57):

• $130,000 spending − $80,500 pension = $49,500/year from portfolio (in future dollars)
• Without the bridge: at 65+, gap narrows as CPP and OAS begin

After CPP and OAS at 65 (with David's CPP, Mary's CPP, both OAS — all delayed to 65):

• Pension income: $72,500 (indexed)
• CPP combined: $24,000
• OAS combined: $17,400
• Total income: $113,900/year
• Spending at 65 (inflated at 2.5% for 25 years): ~$170,000
• Portfolio gap at 65: ~$56,100/year

---

Projecting the Portfolio to Age 57#

They currently have $382,000 and will contribute $42,000/year for 17 years. Assuming a blended average annual return of 6.5% on their 80/20 equity/bond portfolio:

At retirement, they'd have approximately $1.86 million in combined RRSP/TFSA across both accounts.

---

Entering This Into the Retirement Calculator#

Here's how you'd set up this scenario in the retirement withdrawal calculator:

Step 1: Basic Profile#

• Current age: 40 (enter for each spouse)
• Planned retirement age: 57
• Planning horizon: age 95 (conservative; allows 38 years of retirement)

Step 2: Current Account Balances#

• David's RRSP: $185,000
• Mary's RRSP: $95,000
• David's TFSA: $58,000
• Mary's TFSA: $44,000

Step 3: Annual Contributions Until Retirement#

• David RRSP: $18,000/year
• Mary RRSP: $10,000/year
• Both TFSA: $7,000/year each

Step 4: Pension Income#

• Mary's pension: start age 57, $72,500/year, indexed (CPI up to 2%)
• Bridge benefit: $8,000/year extra from age 57 to 65

Step 5: CPP and OAS#

• David CPP: start age 65, $12,600/year; OAS age 65, $8,700/year
• Mary CPP: start age 65, $11,400/year; OAS age 65, $8,700/year

Step 6: Annual Spending Target#

• $90,000/year in today's dollars, inflated at 2.5%/year

Step 7: Investment Return Assumption#

• 6.5% nominal return / 2.5% inflation = 4% real return

---

What the Calculator Reveals#

Running this scenario produces a year-by-year table that looks something like this:

(These are illustrative projections based on assumed returns and inflation — actual results will vary.)

The headline finding: with a $1.86M portfolio at retirement, Mary's indexed pension, and their combined CPP and OAS, David and Mary have a highly resilient retirement plan. The portfolio is still well over $680,000 at age 95 in this base case.

---

What the Calculator Also Reveals: The Risks#

A single base-case projection is only part of the picture. The calculator reveals several important risk factors worth planning around:

Risk 1: The Bridge Period (Ages 57–65)#

The years 57–63 are the most financially demanding. The bridge benefit ends at 65, and until then the portfolio is absorbing $47,000–$73,000/year in withdrawals. The portfolio balance actually grows during ages 57–65 (because the remaining invested balance earns returns exceeding withdrawals) — but just barely. A poor market in years 57–62 could create more stress than the base case suggests.

Mitigation: Maintain 2–3 years of expenses (about $270,000) in stable assets (GICs, HISA, short bonds) at retirement. This is the classic bucket strategy — not investing everything in equities right through retirement.

Risk 2: RRIF Minimums and OAS Clawback#

David's RRSP will convert to a RRIF at 71. By then, his RRIF balance may be $1.2–$1.5 million depending on performance. At age 71, the RRIF minimum is 5.28% — roughly $63,000–$80,000/year from David's RRIF alone. Combined with Mary's pension ($90,000+ indexed by then), CPP, and OAS, total income could approach $230,000+/year — well above the OAS clawback threshold of ~$90,000 per person.

Mitigation: Begin drawing David's RRSP down aggressively in the low-income years from age 57–65 (the RRSP melt-down strategy). At 57 with a $47,500 portfolio withdrawal needed per year, David can withdraw $47,500 from his RRSP at an effective rate of approximately 25% — far cheaper than the 43%+ marginal rate he'd face if RRIF minimums forced large withdrawals at 71 while also receiving full pension + CPP + OAS.

The calculator shows this clearly: redirecting the portfolio withdrawals away from TFSA and toward RRSP early in retirement reduces David's RRIF balance at 71 from ~$1.5M to ~$900K — significantly reducing forced RRIF minimums and the resulting OAS clawback risk.

Risk 3: Mary Predeceases David#

Mary's pension provides the income backbone. If Mary dies before David, the survivor benefit (60% joint life) means David receives:

• 60% × $72,500 = $43,500/year from the pension

Suddenly, the income from the pension drops by $29,000/year. David would also eventually collect Mary's CPP survivor benefit (~$950/month maximum, income-tested). But the gap is significant.

Mitigation: Ensure David has sufficient RRSP/RRIF to absorb the income reduction. Confirm the survivor benefit percentage on Mary's pension plan. Consider term life insurance if the death benefit gap is unacceptable.

---

The Delayed CPP Scenario: A Big Win#

One of the most valuable things the calculator reveals is the CPP delay comparison.

The base case uses CPP at 65. What if both delay CPP to 70?

• David CPP at 70: ~$17,900/year (vs $12,600 at 65)
• Mary CPP at 70: ~$16,200/year (vs $11,400 at 65)
• Combined additional CPP/year from delaying: +$10,100/year permanently, indexed to CPI

To fund CPP delay (ages 65–70, 5 years), the calculator shows the portfolio needs to cover an extra $41,400/year over those 5 years — a total of $207,000 in additional portfolio withdrawals compared to the CPP-at-65 scenario.

But from age 70 onward, you receive $10,100/year more (indexed). Breakeven: ~20 years past 70, which is age 90. Given healthy 40-year-olds planning to a 95-year horizon, this almost certainly wins — and the insurance value of higher indexed income at age 85+ (when healthcare costs spike) is enormous.

Calculator verdict: delay CPP to 70 is worth it for David and Mary, provided the portfolio can sustain the bridge withdrawals, which it clearly can.

---

What Would Make This Plan Fail?#

The calculator is also useful for stress-testing. Key scenarios that could threaten this plan:

No single scenario alone is catastrophic given their strong pension baseline. The combination of two or more (e.g., lower returns + higher spending + early death) would require attention. This is exactly the value of running scenarios in the calculator rather than relying on a single optimistic projection.

---

The 5 Things the Calculator Told David and Mary#

After running through their numbers, here are the five most actionable insights:

1. Their plan works in the base case — but the pension is doing most of the heavy lifting. Without Mary's DB pension, the picture would look completely different.

2. RRSP melt-down is critical — David should prioritize RRSP withdrawals in the 57–65 window to reduce future RRIF minimums and OAS clawback risk. The TFSA should be preserved for later.

3. Delay CPP to 70 — the math clearly favors this given their healthy status and long planning horizon.

4. Build a $250,000 "bucket one" of stable assets before retiring — GICs, high-interest savings, short bonds — to protect against sequence-of-returns risk in the first 3–5 years.

5. Confirm the survivor benefit on Mary's pension — the difference between a 60% and 75% joint life option costs about $3,000–$4,000/year in reduced pension but could mean $20,000+/year more for David if Mary dies first.

---

Try It With Your Own Numbers#

David and Mary's scenario is illustrative. Your situation will differ — different account balances, different pension, different spending goals, different province.

But the process is the same: enter your numbers, run the projection, look for the risks the optimistic base case hides, and use the levers (RRSP melt-down, CPP timing, spending adjustments, asset location) to build the most resilient plan possible.